Vernon Chalmers’ notion of existential
consciousness unfolds through an intricate engagement with being, awareness,
and phenomenological perception. Grounded in the philosophical traditions of
existentialism and phenomenology, his thought reflects an inquiry into the
living act of consciousness — a dynamic movement that situates the self in
dialogue with existence. This essay examines Chalmers’ existential
consciousness as both a reflective and embodied process, one that unites
presence, perception, and ethical responsibility. Through dialogue with
thinkers such as Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and Frankl, Chalmers’
existential consciousness emerges as a response to the perennial question of
being: how the aware subject encounters and interprets the world, and how
meaning arises from that encounter.
Existential consciousness represents a
profound dimension of human awareness — an awakening to one’s own being within
the unfolding of existence. For Vernon Chalmers, this consciousness transcends
cognitive awareness and enters a field of ontological inquiry: it is not simply
to know that one exists, but to live within the awareness of existence as an
unfolding presence. His conception of existential consciousness integrates
phenomenological perception with the existential demand for authenticity and
meaning. In this sense, Chalmers’ work can be read as a meditation on the lived
structure of being-in-the-world, where consciousness becomes both reflective
and embodied. This essay situates Chalmers’ existential consciousness within
philosophical traditions that explore being, perception, and meaning-making.
Drawing upon existentialism and phenomenology, it argues that Chalmers’
consciousness embodies the human struggle for presence, freedom, and connection
within the ever-shifting terrain of existence.
The phenomenological foundation of Chalmers’ existential consciousness lies in the tradition of Edmund Husserl (1983), whose call to return ‘to the things themselves’ reoriented philosophy toward lived experience. Husserl proposed that consciousness is always intentional — directed toward something. For Chalmers, this intentionality becomes a means of grounding awareness in the immediacy of experience. Consciousness is thus not an abstract entity but a lived orientation, a structure through which meaning arises from perception and relation. Maurice Merleau-Ponty (2012) expanded this insight by emphasizing embodiment, asserting that perception is not detached observation but an embodied way of being in the world. Chalmers’ existential consciousness resonates deeply with this view, suggesting that consciousness unfolds through embodied acts of seeing, feeling, and responding. It is through the body and its perceptual field that one encounters the world as lived meaning. This embodied awareness is not passive; it constitutes the foundation of existential engagement, situating the subject within the world as both observer and participant.
Existential Awareness and AuthenticityFor existential thinkers such as Jean-Paul
Sartre (1943/2003) and Martin Heidegger (1927/1962), consciousness is
inextricably tied to authenticity — the capacity to live in accordance with
one’s own understanding of being. Sartre viewed consciousness as a form of
nothingness, a self-reflective void that reveals freedom and responsibility. In
this view, the individual is condemned to freedom, perpetually constructing the
self through choices. Heidegger, on the other hand, emphasized Dasein’s
awareness of its being-toward-death — the recognition of finitude that opens
the possibility of authentic existence. Chalmers’ existential consciousness
aligns with both perspectives: it is an awareness of one’s situatedness, yet it
also carries the moral and creative imperative to live authentically. To be
existentially conscious is to live in awareness of one’s freedom, mortality,
and relational embeddedness. Chalmers’ thought reflects an ethics of
consciousness — an acknowledgment that awareness entails responsibility. This
moral dimension echoes Viktor Frankl’s (1946/2006) notion of the ‘will to
meaning,’ which situates consciousness as a search for purpose even amid
uncertainty or suffering.
Chalmers’ existential consciousness also finds resonance in Martin Buber’s (1970) philosophy of dialogue, which defines human existence through the ‘I–Thou’ relationship. For Buber, authentic being emerges in the direct encounter between self and other, where both are recognized in their wholeness. Chalmers’ conception of consciousness reflects this relational structure: awareness is not solipsistic but intersubjective. Consciousness exists as encounter — as presence that acknowledges the reality of others. This perspective invites an ethical openness, a willingness to meet existence as it unfolds through other beings, forms, and expressions. In this sense, existential consciousness becomes a site of communion, where awareness is inseparable from empathy. Such consciousness bridges the subjective and the universal, the personal and the cosmic. It is through presence that the self realizes its belonging to the broader horizon of existence.
Temporality, Memory, and BecomingChalmers’ understanding of existential
consciousness also engages with the temporal dimension of being. Heidegger
(1962) emphasized that Dasein’s existence is temporal, unfolding as a
projection toward possibilities while grounded in the past. Consciousness,
therefore, is not static; it is a process of becoming. Chalmers extends this
insight by situating consciousness as an evolving awareness — one that
integrates memory, reflection, and anticipation. In this temporal unfolding,
the self continually redefines itself through experience. Memory becomes not a
static archive but an active dialogue with being. Through remembrance, consciousness
connects the lived past with the anticipated future, forming a coherent
narrative of identity. This dynamic process reveals existential consciousness
as an ever-emerging synthesis: an act of becoming that transcends linear time
to affirm presence and transformation.
Existential consciousness, in Chalmers’
framework, extends beyond reflection into creative and ethical expression.
Rollo May (1975) argued that creativity is the courageous act of bringing forth
new being, a process rooted in existential awareness. Chalmers’ consciousness
similarly transforms perception into creation — an act that affirms existence
by rendering it visible. Such creativity embodies the courage to confront the
unknown, to shape meaning from ambiguity. Moreover, existential consciousness
carries an ethical demand: to remain attuned to the value and dignity of
existence itself. Emmanuel Levinas (1969) articulated this as the face-to-face
encounter, where the other’s presence calls the self into moral responsibility.
In this light, Chalmers’ consciousness is both aesthetic and ethical, uniting
the contemplative and the active dimensions of being. It is a consciousness
that sees, feels, and acts in fidelity to the truth of existence.
Vernon Chalmers’ existential consciousness
represents a synthesis of phenomenological insight and existential
authenticity. It is a consciousness that perceives, reflects, and acts in
response to the unfolding mystery of being. Through the phenomenological grounding
of perception, the existential demand for authenticity, and the ethical
openness to others, Chalmers’ thought reveals consciousness as the very site of
meaning. It is neither detached cognition nor mere awareness, but an active,
relational, and temporal engagement with existence. In dialogue with thinkers
such as Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Heidegger, Sartre, and Frankl, Chalmers’
existential consciousness offers a profound vision of human being — one that
unites awareness and responsibility, freedom and care, presence and
transcendence. Ultimately, it affirms the human capacity to awaken within
existence itself, to live consciously as both witness and participant in the
eternal unfolding of being.
Buber, M. (1970). I and
Thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Charles Scribner’s Sons. (Original work published
1923)
Frankl, V. E. (2006).
Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1946)
Heidegger, M. (1962).
Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Harper & Row.
(Original work published 1927)
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas
pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First
book (F. Kersten, Trans.). Martinus Nijhoff. (Original work published 1913)
Levinas, E. (1969).
Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Duquesne
University Press.
May, R. (1975). The
courage to create. W. W. Norton.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012).
Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work
published 1945)
Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1943)
Image: Created by Microsoft Copilot
